SSO does not replace authorization.
SSO addresses how an approved user proves identity. StoRegister roles and property access still determine what that user can see or do, and both layers need separate mapping and acceptance tests.
Identity & access planning
Bring sign-in requirements into the same plan as users, roles, property access, hosting and rollout. StoRegister confirms the supported identity design and implementation scope before go-live.
Provider, protocol, application, plan, environment and authentication-method coverage must be confirmed for the agreed implementation.
Direct answer
StoRegister treats single sign-on as an implementation-scoped identity and access requirement. During solution planning, the team confirms users, applications, roles, property access, deployment, sign-in requirements, testing and ownership. Exact provider and protocol compatibility is documented before implementation.
SSO addresses how an approved user proves identity. StoRegister roles and property access still determine what that user can see or do, and both layers need separate mapping and acceptance tests.
Three separate decisions
Combining them into one “SSO” label hides dependencies that matter during rollout and support.
Define how the user proves identity, which provider and protocol are requested, and what sign-in behaviour is required.
Map what an authenticated user can access across the agreed businesses, facilities and application responsibilities.
Assign onboarding, change, offboarding, recovery, fallback, support and review ownership before launch.
From requirement to acceptance
The implementation becomes testable when each user, application, access decision and exception has an owner.
List user groups, required StoRegister applications, environments, businesses and facilities.
Record the provider, product version, required protocol and sign-in, sign-out and session expectations.
Define StoRegister roles, property access and exceptions after authentication succeeds.
Run permitted, denied, recovery and offboarding cases before approving rollout.
SSO requirements checklist
These are requirements to confirm, not a universal provider or protocol support claim.
Name the provider, product version, tenant or domain context and customer environment.
Confirm the supported protocol, redirect, sign-in, sign-out and session requirements.
List every required StoRegister surface, test environment and production environment.
Map each user group to its intended role, facilities, permissions and exclusions.
Assign joiner, mover, leaver, access recovery, fallback and escalation ownership.
Agree positive, negative, recovery and offboarding cases with evidence and named approvers.
Scope before implementation
Use this boundary to prevent a general SSO label from becoming an unsupported compatibility promise.
The current locked product pages support these planning concepts.
These details depend on the customer environment and agreed implementation.
Evidence-first evaluation
Bring the environment and scenarios; leave with supported coverage, exclusions, ownership and commercial scope in writing.
Provide identity, user, application and deployment requirements.
Confirm the supported provider, protocol, coverage and dependencies.
Exercise permitted, denied, recovery and access-change scenarios.
Document scope, exclusions, owners, support and proposal terms.
Related evidence
Identity belongs beside feature coverage, deployment architecture and evidence-led software evaluation.
Identity questions
Use these answers to identify what is known and what still needs environment-specific confirmation.
Single sign-on is an identity approach that lets a user authenticate through an organisation’s chosen identity system and access configured applications without maintaining a separate sign-in for each one. Exact sign-in, session, recovery and authorization behaviour depends on the provider, protocol and configuration.
StoRegister treats SSO as an implementation-planning item. The evaluation confirms user populations, required applications and environments, identity requirements, roles, property access, deployment context, testing and ownership. The final supported design and implementation scope are documented in the proposal.
Provider and protocol compatibility is confirmed during evaluation against the customer’s identity requirements. Bring the identity provider, product version, required protocol and sign-in behaviour so the supported design, dependencies and any implementation work can be documented before commitment.
Coverage can vary by application, plan, user type, environment, permission and agreed implementation. List every required user population and StoRegister surface, and have the supported coverage and exclusions recorded before implementation.
No. SSO addresses how an approved user proves identity. Roles and property access determine what that signed-in user is allowed to see or do. Both need to be mapped, configured and tested for the agreed operating model.
StoRegister reviews identity, access and SSO requirements alongside regional or dedicated hosting during solution planning. They are related architecture decisions, but selecting an AWS Region does not by itself define or guarantee an identity integration.
Test permitted and denied users, correct roles and property access, required applications and environments, sign-in and sign-out behaviour, recovery, joiner/mover/leaver cases, support ownership and agreed acceptance evidence. Use only methods and scenarios included in the verified scope.
The current published pricing page does not state a standard SSO entitlement or price. Ask StoRegister to document the applicable application, plan, identity-provider, implementation, hosting and support scope in the commercial proposal.
Build a testable identity plan
Bring the identity provider, user groups, applications, roles, environments, recovery cases and rollout owners.